Soros Speculates Against the Euro
Ask not for whom the bell tolls: Greece is tiny compared to bankrupt California. Below: It was easy to speculate against the fixed pound, but Soros now stands to lose his amassed fortune undermining the euro by means fair and foul from his shaky base in the flawed dollar.
Soros and his Wall Street gang have been revealed to be behind the falsification of budget deficits in Greece and Italy, by selling forward public debt, that allowed these countries to join the euro. Now Soros is speculating on the fall of the euro by betting against Greece. Soros, who made $1 billion speculating against the pound in 1992, believes the structure of the euro is patently flawed. In fact he is behind the flaw by cooking the books of weak economies, but more than making another billion he stands to lose his shirt. The dollar is in a much shakier position than the euro, despite speculating China would lose its trillion dollar holdings if it lets the dollar fall (Search Euro or Dollar Suicide Watch?).
George Soros is placing large bear bets against the euro. A secretive group of Wall Street hedge funds are behind a plot to cash in on the decline of the euro. At an ideas dinner in Manhattan, the speculators argued that the euro is likely to plunge to parity with the dollar. The euro has been under enormous pressure because of Greece’s debt crisis, plus financial worries in Portugal, Italy, Spain and Ireland. But, it has also struggled because these hedge funds have been placing huge bets on the currency’s decline, which could make the speculators billions. Soros warned that the euro could fall apart even if the European Union agrees to support stricken Greece. Hitting back Greek PM George Papandreou blames speculators for preying on the country’s troubles. He believes that unless the European Commission is given sweeping powers over taxation and spending, the euro will always be vulnerable to financial turbulence in individual states. Greece is desperate to restore the confidence of investors in its debt after revealing that it understated its budget deficit by half: “There is only one dilemma: Will we let the country go bankrupt or will we react? Will we let the speculators strangle us, or will we take our fate in our own hands?” Angela Merkel admitted that Greece’s debt crisis has plunged the euro into a difficult situation, warning that the euro faces a dangerous period.
(“Man who broke the Bank of England, George Soros, at centre of hedge funds plot to cash in on fall of the euro,” by Karl West, Daily Mail, 27 February 2010)
Soros especula contra l’euro
Li va ser fàcil especular contra la lliura fixa, però Soros arrisca ara perdre la seva fortuna acumulada soscavant l’euro a les bones o les dolentes des de la seva base inestable en un dòlar a l’UVI. Primera foto: No preguntis per qui repiquen les campanes: Grècia és minúscula comparada amb la Califòrnia en bancarrota.
Soros i la seva banda de Wall Street han estat exposats com les mans negres darrere la falsificació dels dèficits fiscals de Grècia i Itàlia, venent al futur deute públic per permetre aquests paisos integrar-se a l’euro. Ara Soros especula que l’euro caigui apostant contra Grècia. Soros, que va guanyar mil milions de dòlars especulant contra la lliura el 1992, creu que l’estructura de l’euro és defectuosa d’entrada. En realitat ell és el responsable del defecte a base de falsificar els comptes d’economies dèbils, però més que guanyar altre mil milions podria ara perdre la camisa. El dòlar es troba en una situació més insegura que l’euro, malgrat especular que Xina perdria el seu bilió en valors en dòlars si permet que el dòlar caigui (Veure search Euro o dòlar en estat de suicidi?).
George Soros està apostant massivament a la baixa contra l’euro. Un grup secret de fons d’inversió lliure està al darrere d’una conspiració per enriquir-se amb el descens de l’euro. En una sopar d’intercanvi d’idees a Manhattan, els especuladors argumentaren que l’euro segurament caurà a la paritat amb el dòlar. L’euro ha estat sotmés a una enorme pressió degut a a la crisi del deute grec, més els dubtes financers sobre Portugal, Itàlia, Espanya i Irlanda. Però també ha patit perqué els fons de lliure inversió han realitzat enormes apostes sobre la caiguda de la divisa, que reportaria bilions als especuladors. Soros avisa que l’euro podria petar encara que la Unió Europea acordi sostenir la malferida Grècia. Contratacant el primer ministre grec Georgios Papandreou acusa els especuladors de fer d’incendiaris amb els problemes del país. Creu que si la Comissió Europea no prén poders amples sobre impostos i despesa, l’euro sempre restarà vulnerable a turbulències financeres en paisos concrets. Grècia lluita desesperada per restablir la confiança dels inversors en el seu deute després d’haver admès que va amagar la meitat del seu dèficiti pressupostari: “Queda una sola pregunta: permetrem que el país es declari en bancarrota o reaccionarem? Permetrem que els especuladors ens ofeguin o ens fem amos del nostre propi destí?” Angela Merkel ha admès que la crisi del deute grec ha dut l’euro a una situació difícil i avisa que que l’euro encara viurà moments perillosos.
(“Man who broke the Bank of England, George Soros, at centre of hedge funds plot to cash in on fall of the euro,” by Karl West, Daily Mail, 27 February 2010)
Millions of unemployed face years without jobs
Top firms cause $2.2 trillion of environmental damage
Unions blast $15 billion jobs legislation as ‘puny’
A new kind of leaf blower
Kucinich challenges Gates on civilians killed in Afghanistan
Gates calls European mood ‘danger to peace’
US media replays Iraq fiasco on Iran
Iraqi parliamentarian denies US charges of terrorism
Poland admits role in CIA rendition program
Afghan wounded tell of more left behind in Marjah
Darfur signs cease fire as violence in south claims 28 lives
Groups demand Turkey do more to protect transgender people
Rachel Corrie’s family bring civil suit over human shield’s death in Gaza
UN says US aid restrictions on Somalia are hurting millions of hungry Somalis
Escalating Falklands oil dispute goes to UN
Dutch cabinet collapses in dispute over Afghanistan
LOSSES SHRINK: Higher ticket fees and the lack of large impairment charges helped fourth-quarter losses shrink at Live Nation Entertainment Inc. Live Nation’s operating losses fell to $64 million from $323 million, while merger partner Ticketmaster turned a $35 million operating profit, reversing a $1.07 billion loss.
REGULATORY HEADWINDS: Merger conditions costing $20 million this year will mean adjusted operating profits will be flat to down in 2010 personal humidifier.
FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES: The combined concert company hopes to benefit from paperless ticketing, dynamic pricing where consumers can pick the seat they want, and selling music and merchandise with tickets.
I could have easily titled this: “Ronald Reagan Speaks Out Against Obama’s Healthcare Reform.”
Friends, listen. Listen closely.
When will President Obama and his fellow Democrats realize that no means no? The American people oppose, by a 2/3 margin, the healthcare legislation Obama is trying to ram down our throats. Yet, he isn’t giving up. Consider that.
I want to start this blog with a disclaimer. The photograph of Laurie is one that I took. It belongs to me. I have the original image data from my digital camera recorded and any re-use of this image without my expressed written permission is prohibited. Yes it’s a lousy photo, but I did not want to run the risk of surfing the Internet for a better picture of Laurie for fear of litigation!
The blog material below was taken from personal video and notes taken during a speech given by Ms. Janik to the Iowa Association of REALTORS annual Legislative luncheon.
Thank you for taking time to come to speak to the Iowa Association of REALTORS, Laurie. (All comments above were intended as humor Laurie.. really!)
Top 10 Legal Issues for REALTORS in 2010
RESPA. Receiving increased attention by HUD and the Plaintiff’s Bar. Two hot topics investigated now are Transaction Fees/Administrative Fees. 8th Circuit has established that this practice is lawful. 2nd area being litigated is the Home Building Industry where Builders are offering to pay buyers costs if the buyer uses a builder affiliated mortgage company. Remember that it’s illegal for REALTORS to accept anything of value or pay anything of value in exchange for a “naked” referral. Meal in a restaurant, green fees, tickets to an event are not allowed.
Misrepresentation in the sale of a property. Failure to disclose material facts. Most common plaintiff is a buyer of a home. Best defense is use of a property condition disclosure form. Must be filled out BY the seller, not the agent. You want it to be what the seller has to say about the property. Agent has a duty to disclose knowledge of falsities made by sellers on forms and will be held liable. Disclose and give buyers the opportunity to complete their own independent inspections.
Agency. NAR statistic: 23% of buyers recall being talked to about Agency at the beginning of the home buying process. Litigation is increasing regarding agents putting their interests ahead of the client. You can NEVER put your interests ahead of your client. It’s very expensive to breach your fiduciary duties. Make your disclosures more memorable.
Fair Housing. The law is over 40 years old and we are still seeing discrimination in the housing market. Disability is 43% of claims. 37% on Race. 13% on Familial Status. Seeing complaints against agents based on remarks in listings on MLS. “Cottage suitable for Singles” “Single Professional Preferred”. Advice: ALWAYS describe Property, NOT the prospective occupant.
Unauthorized Practice of Law. Seeing increased complaints against real estate agents alleging that agents are engaging in the unauthorized practice of law stemming from your conduct in guiding and assisting home sellers who are facing foreclosure. And you engaging in negotiations or advising these home sellers who are facing foreclosure on the strategy for their negotiations with their lenders. Keep in mind you are licensed to broker property, to market the property, to bring buyers and sellers together. You should not be attempting to represent the legal interests of these home sellers in their negotiations with their lenders. You shouldn’t be advising them of their legal rights during their negotiations with their lenders. Be cautious, this is an emerging issue.
Anti Trust. FTC and USDOJ have taken a keen interest in the real estate industry. Watching that “Traditional Brokers” are not doing anything to impede the ability of new innovative brokers from coming into a market. Don’t discuss commission rates, etc. Be prepared to explain your fees and tell consumers what services you provide for the services you provide them.
Social Media. When on the Internet the Code of Ethics and Laws of the Land DO apply. You have to be responsible for what you post. Do not steal others copyright… text, photos, statistics, etc. Be careful of what you post in comments. If you have a Blog and/or Website, check with your E&O carrier to see if they cover claims that arise from Blogs & Websites. New Rules propagated by the FTC: Testimonials on Blogs must disclose if you have been paid to disclose. This is a whole new area for us to get into trouble so proceed with caution.
Independent Contractor Status. The Federal and State governments are beginning to take a closer look at Independent contractors as potential sources of taxes. Obama administration is searching for Misclassified Workers looking to crackdown and yield at least 7 Billion dollars over the next 10 years. Appraisal firms are now being audited for this issue.
Private Transfer Fees. Not a transfer tax, but rather a private fee that goes to someone (a developer for example) that is filed and runs with the land that says every time this land gets sold, a fee gets paid. So every subsequent sale of the property generates this fee. These fees can be up to 1% in some cases. Four states have banned this practice. Florida, Oklahoma, Kansas and Missouri. NAR is firmly on record as opposed to this practice.
Mortgage Interest Deductibility. The Obama Administration is proposing taking away the Mortgage Interest deduction for the top 33% & 35% of tax bracket. NAR is opposing this and working to get this out of the budget proposals. The housing market can not take any more bad news at this time.
From a speech given by Laurie Janik, NAR Legal Counsel on February 23rd, 2010 in Des Moines Iowa.
New Health Care Plan was unveiled by the White House.
It occurred to me that I have heard this song before. Over the last 18 months or so, the true believers of Obama’s powers to transform have helped to create a narrative that doomed this President with respect to meeting expectations.
Obama promised many things and helped to paint vivid imagery of how he would be a “transformative” (new word) force in politics like Ronald Reagan. It was a nice pander to independents and Republicans, but totally devoid of historical fact.
Here is the rambling quote – from comments to the Reno Gazette Journal Editorial Board:
I don’t want to present myself as some sort of singular figure. I think part of what’s different are the times. I do think that, for example, the 1980 election was different. I think Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that you know Richard Nixon did not, and in a way that Bill Clinton did not. He put us on a fundamentally different path because the country was ready for it. I think they felt like, you know, with all the excesses of the 60’s and the 70’s and, you know, government had grown and grown but there wasn’t much sense of accountability in terms of how it was operating. And I think people just tapped into – he tapped into what people were already feeling, which is we want clarity, we want optimism, we want you know a return to that sense of dynamism and you know, entrepreneurship that had been missing, alright?
His message of hope and change and a host of empty promises followed right up through and even after his inauguration.
Obama has been singing the first verse of the Riddle Song to us the whole time. The public just interrupted him and smashed his guitar against the wall.
Obama promised us a cherry, that has no stone. (Stimulus would reduce unemployment and save the economy from recession)
Obama promised us a chicken, that has no bone. (Health care “reform” that has no reform – just a “progressive” wet dream)
Obama told us all a story, that has no end. (Transparent government? Close Gitmo? End war? Talk is cheap – so far, there isn’t much doing)
SMASH!!!!!! Election losses overwhelm push polls that were artificially keeping his numbers up.
….American philosopher Eric Hoffer said, “If a society is to preserve stability and a degree of continuity, it must know how to keep its adolescents from imposing their tastes, attitudes, values and fantasies on everyday life.” Too bad Hoffer never met Jamie Murray Wells.
In 2004 while studying for final exams at University of the West of England, Wells, then age 21, went shopping for a pair of prescription glasses. Nonplussed by the $150 pound ($300) price tag, Wells decided to funnel his $2,000 student loan into what would become Glasses Direct, a London-based online retailer that now generates $5 million in annual revenue.
Wells is part of an elite club of preternatural wealth builders who managed to cobble million-dollar enterprises before they graduated from college. The “million-dollar” measure refers to either total revenue generated or the value of the enterprise built (as opposed to the size of the total profit pile). That’s no mean feat for any entrepreneur, let alone one who can barely buy a drink legally in the States.
The nine entrepreneurs featured in our slideshow — six from the U.S. and three from the U.K. — started launching businesses by the tender age of 15, and one before he broke double-digits – Read full article…
Click here to register your vote to establish a U.S. Department of Peace, and send your message to Congress here. The bill to establish a Department of Peace is now before the House of Representatives, and, among other things, would provide funding to establish a U.S. Peace Academy which would act as a counterpart to the U.S. Military Academy, teach violence prevention and mediation to America’s school children, and provide complimentary support to our military by engaging in parallel peace-building activities.
The Woodstock Council for World Peace has already sent a letter of support for the Department of Peace to Congressman Dennis Kucinich, who first introduced this bill in July 2001, shortly before the attacks of 9/11. Unfortunately, our country’s reaction to those attacks, and George W. Bush’s mistaken policy of GWOT (Global War on Terror) has allowed this bill to languish. Make your voices heard, and tell Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and your representatives that you want the United States Department of Peace to become a reality.
We are living in a world that is witnessing the threats of habitat and biodiversity loss, fisheries depletion, global economic stress and and world hunger; in such a world, war is unsustainable.
The above views are my own, and do not necessarily represent the views of The Woodstock Council for World Peace.
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama’s administration plans to rebrand its military operation in Iraq “Operation New Dawn,” beginning September 1, a Pentagon memorandum shows.
The memo, signed by US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, shows the Pentagon approving a request to switch the name of the US military effort in Iraq from its current designation — “Operation Iraqi Freedom.”
“The request… is approved to take effect 1 September 2010, coinciding with the change of mission for US forces in Iraq.
“Aligning the name change with the change of mission sends a strong signal that Operation Iraqi Freedom has ended and our forces are operating under a new mission,” Gates wrote in the memo, first reported by ABC News.
The document, which is addressed to General David Petraeus, the head of US Central Command, adds the rebranding “presents opportunities to synchronize strategic communication initiatives… and recognize our evolving relationship with the government of Iraq.”
The move quickly drew criticism from Military Families United, a national security pressure group.
“You cannot end a war simply by changing its name,” Brian Wise, the group’s executive director, said in a statement.
“Despite the administration’s efforts to spin realities on the ground, their efforts do not change the situation at hand in Iraq.
“Operational military decisions should not be made for purposes of public relations but should be made in the best interests of our nation, the troops on the ground and their families back home.”
Obama ran for office in 2008 on a platform that emphasized a pledge to withdraw US troops from Iraq and focus on the war in Afghanistan.
There are now some 97,000 US troops stationed in Iraq, the first time the number has fallen below 100,000 since the US-led invasion of the country in 2003, according to the Pentagon.
That figure is scheduled to fall to around 50,000 by the end of August, with those troops left behind functioning in advisory and training roles solely.
All US troops are scheduled to withdraw from Iraq by the end of 2011.
The image of banks locking their doors to keep customers from making withdrawals during a bank run is what immediately came to mind when we heard that Citigroup was telling customers it has the right to prevent any withdrawals from checking accounts for seven days.
“Effective April 1, 2010, we reserve the right to require (7) days advance notice before permitting a withdrawal from all checking accounts. While we do not currently exercise this right and have not exercised it in the past, we are required by law to notify you of this change,” Citigroup said on statements received by customers all over the country.
-
-
What’s going on? It seems that this is something of an error. The seven day notice policy only applies to customers in Texas, Ira Stoll reports at The Future of Capitalism. It was accidentally included on customer statements nationwide.
“Whatever the explanation, it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in Citi,” Stoll writes. “But it’s hard to believe a bank would be sending out a notice like that on its statements.”
At a small Asian mall where I normally have my monthly haircut I saw a sign at a store window : “ FREE OVERSEAS CALL – 30 MINUTES”. It was a promotion for a startup company competing in the VOIP ( Voice Over IP ) or voice over the internet space. The ad was true and you can call for free to any of the 20 countries the company covers under its unlimited overseas plan. Unfortunately, RP was not included in the list. I already got a sense that RP is a long shot, considering the ludcirous long distance rate it charges compared to other countries. I blogged about this issue in 2007 and things haven’t changed. After a couple of years, RP rates have just gone down a tad 2 cents per minute on the average, from 13 cents down to 11 cents. Pretty pathetic considering that other countries have opened up, making their countries accessible for business.
This company offers 9.9 cents per min for cell phone but 11.9 cents for landline. Still high. Moreover, businesses use landlines more than cell phones. Very high compared to India, where the rate dropped from 7.9 cents to 1.9 cents over the last 2 years. Now this tells me that India is open for business. True to India’s reputation of being the world’s largest call center outsourcer, its cheap long distance rates certainly helps in promoting the business. Contrast this with the high rates to RP because a clique of RP telecom carriers are playing their selfish game of enriching their treasure chests, trying to hold on to their monopolistic practices. Blame the government for its lame policies, reneging on its mission to promote the interests of the country first, allowing itself to be manipulated by the powerful bigwigs of the telecom industry. While the rest of the world are opening up and embracing deregulation, RP is acting only on the interests of a couple of telecom providers, whose main mission is the preservation of their obscene profit margins and the systematic decimation of potential competitors.
For as low as 5 bucks extra per month some providers can give you unlimited calling to 50 countries. Why are India, Brunei, Malaysia and Thailand on the list and not RP ? Here’s another pathetic example – a Tagalog sounding provider offering unlimited calling to 40 countries for a fixed monthly fee. The only problem is RP isn’t on its list of the 40 countries. Why shoot yourself in the foot with the Tagalog name when Pinas isn’t even on your frigging list ? The irony is I get a lot of telemarketing calls from Pinas, offering prepaid telephone calling cards so I can save money on the ludicrous long distance rates. I don’t need the stupid calling cards – they’re being sold here too. I need cheap rates with the likes of other Asian countries. Don’t expect RP to be in the list of countries that want to do business with the rest of the world anytime soon. It’s government is more interested in fattening the profits of its carriers rather than encouraging economic growth through trade and commerce.
Talking about government bureaucracy or idiocy in Pinas, years ago its telecommunications agency proposed a rule that stores selling Bluetooth capable devices must employ a licensed ECE (Electronics and Communications Engr) else it would be restricted from selling the product. LOL. Now that’s like requiring a licensed mechanical engineer for store that sell bicycles Now you know where the problem lies – if you can’t fucking understand how Bluetooth works , how can you possibly manage a country’s telecommunications infrastructure effectively?
MARIAH – DIVALICIOUS AT 40
As mentioned in my previous post, the wifey and I had our pre-Valentine celebration at the Mariah Carey concert at the ACC last February 9th. The show was supposed to start at 730pm with the group RydazNrtist opening the show for 20 minutes with Mariah to follow. It turned out the opening act started at around 800pm and Mariah came out 45 minutes after the group finished its number, duh. What a wait. I actually thought she came out because of the loud boos from the crowd who were obviously pissed by the long delay. When the curtains opened, Mariah was perched on a swing high up in the ceiling , looking resplendent, wrapped in her gold colored gown. She slowly descended to the stage floor amidst the loud ovation from the crowd. For those who were served food at the executive boxes, she showed up at dessert time After a song two male dancers promptly stripped the bottom part of her gown transforming her attire into a mini skirt revealing her legs. Alas, the almost 2 hour wait was instantly forgotten. The mere sight of her sufficed for an unequivocal forgiveness.
It turned out that Mariah was suffering from a slight cold and was incessantly sipping a combination of tea, apple cider and water from a small table at the corner of the stage. At one point, she offered her wine glass filled with cider to a die hard male fan at the front row. She begged forgiveness for her cold and the lipstick mark on the glass. I knew the man couldn’t care less. I wouldn’t – even if she had swine flu – hahaha Just joking – I got the swine flu vaccine, remember ?
One thing a bit disappointing about Mariah was she barely moved , no matter the tempo of the song. I wasn’t sure if it had to do with her well endowed (materiales fuertes) baggage or the 5 inch heels which made her look like she was tiptoeing on the stage the whole time. But who really cared. Her divalicious image nullified all her shortcomings. She’s a gorgeous diva who can really sing – period. The production wasn’t all that great, the dancers were amateurish, the sound system was too loud , the reviews were so so but heck I would pay to watch her if she was singing inside a garage. Maria Carey turns 40 in March. Still divalicious – without a doubt
KUALA LUMPUR — Fatwa, imam, hajj — words that have passed the lips of millions of people in the Muslim world and beyond. Here in Malaysia, where religious tensions periodically simmer and boil, non-Muslims can be jailed up to a year for writing or uttering them outside of an Islamic context.
More than two dozen words and phrases are banned for non-Muslims by a law that ostensibly seeks to prevent members of other religions, chiefly Christians, from trying to convert Muslims, who make up about 60 percent of Malaysia’s population.
Until recently the ban, which carries a maximum one-year prison sentence, was obscure: it has only been used once in court, according to Pawancheek Marican, a Malaysian lawyer who has written about it. Now a debate about these banned words has become the latest chapter in what is known here as the Allah issue.
A decision in December by a judge to overturn a government ban on the use of the word Allah by a Catholic newspaper has led Malaysians of all traditions — Muslims, Christians, Buddhists and Hindus — to question the boundaries of religious freedom.
In January the government announced it would appeal the Allah case. Tensions escalated when churches were burned and the severed heads of wild boars, offensive to Muslims, were found in the compound of two mosques.
The issue has embittered Christians and roiled Muslim sensibilities. But in a country where religion and ethnic politics are intertwined, many people see the issue as more politics than religion, a reflection of the country’s persistent political turmoil.
The Allah controversy is unique to Malaysia. Christians in neighboring Indonesia and in the Arab world use the word freely.
The Allah issue here comes at a time when Malaysia’s economy is struggling to rebound, foreign investment is flat and the long-term prospects for the erstwhile Asian Tiger are uncertain. The economy shrank an estimated 3.6 percent last year, and the International Monetary Fund forecasts a meager rebound this year of 2.5 percent.
“If the economy does well, a lot of people’s attention will be on their livelihoods as opposed to issues that drive us apart,” said Khairy Jamaluddin, the head of the influential youth wing of the United Malays National Organization, the lead party in the governing coalition.
Because of its polyglot patchwork of ethnic groups and riches in natural resources, Malaysia is distinct from other Asian countries, both more volatile and better endowed. But it is tempting to see Malaysia’s political woes as a warning flag for China and other countries currently relying on economic growth as a political salve.
When the growth stops the divisions in society seem to deepen. Malaysia enjoyed 9 percent annual growth for the early part of the 1990s, but those years of autopilot economic successes are gone. Malaysia’s political class is in tumult, obsessed with what one maverick member of the governing party calls “infantile ethnic politics.”
The Malay Muslim governing class is divided between dreams of continued political supremacy — every prime minister since independence has been Malay — or a more multiethnic political template espoused by the opposition led by Anwar Ibrahim, a former deputy prime minister. Mr. Anwar is Malay, but his party includes top officers of other ethnicities.
Mr. Anwar led the opposition to record gains in 2008, nearly unseating the government. He is now on trial in a highly politicized sodomy case. (He was also charged in a separate sodomy case a decade ago and was ultimately acquitted.)
Initially some politicians saw the Allah issue as a battering ram to defeat the opposition, unite Malay Muslims and reduce the reliance on minorities for political support. The government, which usually suppresses street demonstrations, allowed Muslim protesters to gather. They changed their minds after the church burnings.
Rather than fortifying the governing coalition, the Allah issue has proved awkwardly divisive, angering Christians living across the South China Sea in the two Malaysian states of northern Borneo, who are linchpin members.
Scrambling to keep their creaking political alliance together, government ministers suggested a strangely bifurcated policy on the divinity: Borneo Christians are allowed to use the word Allah, but Christians on the mainland are not.
The Allah issue spans a series of laws and government regulations, but the main list of banned words dates to the late 1980s. Among other words and phrases banned for non-Muslims are sheik, mufti, Allahu akbar (God is great) and inshallah (God willing).
The larger issue for Malaysia is more existential. There remains a lingering question mark over the sustainability of an ethnically segregated political system — Malays, Chinese and Indians have separate parties — in what has become a relatively modern and cosmopolitan society.
Many Malaysians who live in the country’s multicultural urban areas say they no longer identify with an ethnic-based political system. The parties representing Chinese and Indian voters in the governing coalition were nearly wiped out in the 2008 elections. But members of the coalition see no alternative.
“It’s a basic principle that must stay — each race must have their party,” said Idris Haron, a member of Parliament for the governing party and, at 43 years old, the youngest member of its Supreme Council.
Yes, Malaysian society has changed from the time of independence from Britain in 1957, Mr. Idris said in an interview. But Malaysians need to be trained to re-embrace ethnic political segregation, he said. “I believe the system will pattern the culture,” he said. He used the example of a factory that has trouble with tardy employees. “A punch card system will make workers come on time.”
At times the developments of recent weeks, the church burnings and divisive rhetoric, have been alarming to outsiders. But Malaysia is better than the headlines it generates. No one was hurt in the fires, and there remains no palpable tension in the streets of Kuala Lumpur.
“These disturbances came from a few politically linked people,” said Lawrence Andrew, a Catholic priest who is editor of The Herald, the newspaper banned from using Allah. “In that sense there is no real tension.”
The Allah issue and the Anwar trial are likely to remain political preoccupations for months to come. “But there is a bigger problem at our doorstep, and that is the long-term survival of Malaysia in terms of its economic competitiveness,” said Mr. Khairy, the head of the governing party’s youth wing. “If we take our eyes off that we’re in trouble.”
…Said Issa: “The new guidance counts every job that is funded using stimulus money — even if it existed before the Recovery Act, and was not in any danger of being eliminated — as ‘created or saved.’ This definition ignores the plain meanings of the words ‘created’ and ’saved,’ and makes Recovery.gov’s ‘JOBS CREATED/SAVED’ label a falsehood, further eroding the confidence of the American people in their government.”
Some of the president’s closest economic advisers also made some startling claims in connection with the new Economic Report. Council of Economic Advisers chairwoman Christina Romer, for example, said the economic stimulus program saved millions of Americans from “destitution.” The dictionary defines destitution as “utter poverty” and the “lack of the means of subsistence.” Who could have imagined that wasting money on fake jobs would yield such miraculous results?
I came across a fantastic church giving letter from Mike Schreiner who pastors Morning Star Church. I liked it so much that I contacted Mike to see if he’d be willing to answer a few questions. I’m grateful that he allowed me to share this letter with you and took the time to answer my questions. I know you’ll enjoy reading his responses as much as I did.
1. Why did you decide to send a letter like this?
We wanted the information to be clear and concise, easy to read and comprehend.
2. How did you decide what format to use?
We decided to create an identity package around our annual giving initiative, so every element our church family encountered had the same look and feel. By doing so, I hope our folks experienced the series as both purposeful and well-prepared. Using bold colors and disarming language is one of strategies we employed to address the “money issue” head on, rather than shying away from it . . . which is a more authentic approach to the topic. Let’s be honest: Many of the people receiving this material really didn’t want to receive it. So, we chose to call that out, rather than pretend that wasn’t the case, and tried to find ways to draw them in anyway.
3. What feedback did you receive from the congregation?
The one consistent piece of feedback has been how much people appreciated knowing the information. And the real key to our stewardship campaign this year was the idea that, if each of us grows in our giving by just an average of 1% of our Annual Household Income, that will translate to about a $500,000 increase in tithes and offerings. This whole idea just came to me one day. I was thinking to myself: “Hey, if we all give 1% more, then the church will have 1% more, right?” But that’s NOT right! Just a 1% jump—each family/giving unit increasing their giving 1% of their household income (i.e. going from giving 3% to 4%)—would, in fact, raise our overall giving by about 30%! This is something that I think every pastor and church could benefit from—seeing what could happen when each family commits to growing at least 1% more in a year (simultaneously encouraging them to tithe or to be intentional about growing toward the tithe).
4. What impact did it have on church giving?
We had a great last quarter. Overall our tithes and offerings increased 30% in 2009 over 2008! And I’ve personally heard more people talk about giving, stepping up to the full tithe and/or, for the first time ever, to commit to grow toward the tithe! It’s really been cool to see how God is using this… and blessing people in the process. (It should also be said that our church has now run Financial Peace University for a couple years, and this class has helped us in coming alongside debt-ridden families and offering them very practical teaching to equip them to be financially victorious.)
5. What did you learn through the process?
Two things:
1. Share information! Do it through mailings, Town Hall Meetings/All Church meetings/Small Group meetings, messages, website. People really DO want to know. And they need to see the same information multiple times and in multiple formats.
2. Be transparent with your finances. (This isn’t something we learned through this. We always have been. But we hear lots of stories of folks coming from other churches where the details of financial spending and accountability were not open to the membership.) We encourage any and all questions through our Town Hall Meetings as well as in our worship services (we take questions via texting on cell phones, and we answer a few at the end of each message). Members of the church can come in the office and see a full, line-item detail of our budget and monthly Profit/Loss statements—anything we have is open for them to see.
6. If you had to do it again, what would you change about it (if anything) and why?
I’d share the step-chart that showed the number of households in our congregation who gave at various levels (i.e. 0-$100; $100-250; $250-500… on up to $25,000+) in worship and not just in our Town Hall Meetings.
7. What advice would you offer to other pastors considering doing something similar?
Think with the end in mind: I’ve heard it said that communication isn’t about sending the right message; it’s about eliciting the right response. So, be authentic to your particular church environment. We can get a little sarcastic in our language because that’s kind of the “voice” our culture has around here. (That sounds terrible! It’s not disrespectful or vulgar of course . . . it’s just real.) If you were to repurpose our materials for your church and ended up offending half your people, that’s no good. So take time to explore the best way to communicate with your people.
It is no small irony that despite stark budget figures and an even bleaker future for the American working class, Washington Technology reported January 28 that the “29 largest publicly traded defense contractors increased their use of offshore subsidiaries by 26 percent from 2003 to 2008.”
You would think these firms – the Military-Industrial-Security-Complex –flush with record profits since the U.S. embarked on its “War on Terror” in 2001, would do something paying their fair share of taxes or providing benefits to workers, given severe budgetary pressures on domestic programs, dizzying housing foreclosure rates and skyrocketing unemployment. You’d be wrong, however; dead wrong.
A new report published by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in January found, “Many of the top 29 U.S. publicly traded defense contractors–those with $1 billion or more in Department of Defense (DoD) contracts in fiscal year 2008–have created offshore subsidiaries to … “help the 29 contractors reduce taxes, with about one-third decreasing their effective U.S. corporate tax rates.
Interestingly enough, many of the global hidey-holes used to shield corporate wealth from the IRS have long been identified by law enforcement investigators and political researchers as prime money-laundering venues for the international drugs trade.
Gretchen Morgenson in yesterday’s New York Times on the lack of action on financial reform from our alleged representatives in the District of Columbia
“As Washington spins its wheels on financial reform, it’s becoming painfully clear that the problem of entities that are too interconnected or “too politically powerful to fail” is also too hard for our policy makers to tackle.”
What Ms. Morgenson calls Washington “spinning its wheels,” is more appropriately named the “appease the peasants” circus. That time-honored D.C. tradition of giving the appearance of doing something while actually, and intentionally, doing nothing. And it’s not that it’s “too hard to tackle,” they have a financial interest in not tackling it.
“As taxpayers, we obviously can’t rely on lawmakers to address the risks we face from the ever-expanding corporate safety net thrown under teetering behemoths. But because we are footing the bills for these rescues — and will do so again if more crises occur — don’t you agree that we should know what these implied federal guarantees will cost us?…If the government won’t reduce the size of the safety net, and it has shown no appetite for doing so, it should at least tell us the price tag.”
To the contrary, “the government”—and not just the Capitol Hill gang but those who give lip service to openness and transparency at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue—is doing everything in its power to keep us from seeing that “price tag” as well as who received what.
“The Federal Reserve asked a U.S. appeals court to block a ruling that for the first time would force the central bank to reveal secret identities of financial firms that might have collapsed without the largest government bailout in U.S. history.
The U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan will decide whether the Fed must release records of the unprecedented $2 trillion U.S. loan program launched after the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.”
The Obama Justice Department cites the need for secrecy “confidentiality:”
“Confidentiality is essential to the success of the board’s statutory mission to maintain the health of the nation’s financial system and conduct monetary policy,” Assistant U.S. Attorney General Tony West and Fed lawyer Richard Ashton wrote in a legal brief to the appeals court.”
Never mind this:
“The lawsuit, brought under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, came as President Barack Obama criticized the previous administration’s handling of the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program passed by Congress in October 2008. Obama has said funds were spent by the administration of former President George W. Bush with little accountability or transparency.”
Imagine your life without the stress, strains and limitations of
“the economy.”
How different would your life be if you weren’t
experiencing any financial pressure?
What if you could dictate your own economic and financial policy?
My friend Margaret Lynch did a very special internet webcast this
past weekend, she answered LOTS of common questions about overcome
financial blocks and barriers…PLUS she led us through two unique
session designed to release limitations brought on by our feelings
about the uncertain economy.
For a short time, you can still catch the replay of that teleclass
for F-R-E-E right here: N.B. the words shopping cart in the link is part of file name and not an actual checkout cart – You will not be charged! http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/?Clk=3402714
Over the past couple of weeks, Margaret has provided with some
incredible videos and other free material, about breaking through
wealth blocks and barriers, to supercharge the Law of Attraction so
that you can start working more “miracles” in your life.
Her techniques are simple and fast…and they REALLY work!
It’s amazing stuff…check it out.
http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/?Clk=3402714
You can also see a sample for Free Video #4 – Double Your Income and Tap Into Your Brilliance http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/?Clk=3402715
Remember there is a time limit on this so do yourself a favour and go to the links now to find out more.
GeeZone – Massage, Health & Beauty Therapies.
Holistic & Remedial treatments, services and products available with the categories of Massage (various techniques), Health (body, mind & spirit) & Beauty (a select range of services). Geezone provide an onsite massage treatment service for organisations and businesses. GeeZone provide workshops on various massage, health and beauty subjects. Geezone also distribute and are affiliated with top brand high quality supplement and skin care companies providing effective, quality products online at a excellent price. Helping U 2 Help U . . . Unlock Your Potential!
************************************ GeeZone – Massage, Health & Beauty Therapies
Gee Morris-Osborne MAR: BACS: BABTAC
Director/Consultant/Therapies/Personal, Life and Health Coach
For further information on services and products
call/text: +44(0)7931 100 093
email: geeoz5@aol.com
Web: http://sites.google.com/site/geezonebiz
************************************* Contacts & Links:
GeeZone Website – http://sites.google.com/site/geezonebiz
Join me on Twitter – www.twitter.com/gee_zone
Join me on myspace – http://www.myspace.com/geezone
Join me on BT Tradespace – http://geezonemhb.bttradespace.com/
Join me Holistic Massage, Health & Beauty FaceBook Page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/GeeZone-Holistic-Massage-Health-Beauty-Therapies/158547696017?ref=ts
Join me on Hubpages – Personal & Mind Development – http://hubpages.com/hub/GeeZone
Join me on WordPress – Personal, Mind & Body Development – http://www.geeoz5.wordpress.com
Join me on Blogspot – http://geezoneholisticmassagehealthbeauty.blogspot.com/
Join me on Google – http://www.google.com/profiles/GeeZonebiz
Join me on LinkedIN – http://www.linkedin.com/in/geezonegeemorrisosborne
*********************
Disclaimer:
The information provided on this website should not be used as a replacement for medical diagnosis, advice, or treatment. Always discuss any health problem or issues you have with your doctor or health care agent.
GeeZone is not responsible for any information or advice given on links from our website. Again, please consult your doctor or health care agent about any medical concerns. Links are primarily provided for further information or products connected with the subject discussed on the page where link’s are found.
NEWS Weekly Address: Pay As You Go Posted by Jesse Lee February 12, 2010: 06:22 PM EST
The President, having just signed the “Pay As You Go” law, discusses the importance of this fundamental rule to getting budget deficits in check. Ensuring that new spending and tax cuts are offset was a important factor in creating the budget surplus of the late 1990’s.
Weekly Address: President Obama Praises Restoration of Pay-As-You-Go
Washington – Hours after signing pay-as-you-go legislation into law, President Barack Obama praised this step towards restoring fiscal responsibility and called for both parties to set aside politics and do the hard work of addressing the deficit. To this end, since the proposed Fiscal Commission was recently blocked in the Senate – by a handful of Republicans who had previously backed the idea — the President will create this commission by executive order. The President believes it is time for Washington to once again take responsibility for every dollar it spends.
Remarks of President Barack Obama
Weekly Address
February 13, 2010
All across America, people work hard to meet their responsibilities. You do your jobs, take care of your families, pay your bills. Sometimes, particularly in tough times like these, you have to make hard choices about where to spend and where to save. That’s what being responsible means. That’s a bedrock value of our country. And that ought to be a value that our government lives up to as well.
Yet, over the past decade, this hasn’t always not been the case. Ten years ago, we had a big budget surplus with projected surpluses far into the future. Ten years later, those surpluses are gone. In fact, when I first walked through the door, the government’s budget deficit stood at $1.3 trillion, with the budget gap over the next decade projected to be $8 trillion.
Partly, the recession is to blame. With millions of people out of work, and millions of families facing hardship, folks are paying less in taxes while seeking more services, like unemployment benefits. Rising health care costs are also to blame. Each year, more and more tax dollars are devoted to Medicare and Medicaid.
But what also made these large deficits possible was the end of a common sense rule called “pay as you go.” It’s pretty simple. It says to Congress, you have to pay as you go. You can’t spend a dollar unless you cut a dollar elsewhere. This is how a responsible family or business manages a budget. And this is how a responsible government manages a budget, as well.
It was this rule that helped lead to balanced budgets in the 1990s, by making clear that we could not increase entitlement spending or cut taxes simply by borrowing more money. And it was the abandonment of this rule that allowed the previous administration and previous congresses to pass massive tax cuts for the wealthy and create an expensive new drug program without paying for any of it. Now in a perfect world, Congress would not have needed a law to act responsibly, to remember that every dollar spent would come from taxpayers today – or our children tomorrow.
But this isn’t a perfect world. This is Washington. And while in theory there is bipartisan agreement on moving on balanced budgets, in practice, this responsibility for the future is often overwhelmed by the politics of the moment. It falls prey to the pressure of special interests, to the pull of local concerns, and to a reality familiar to every single American – the fact that it is a lot easier to spend a dollar than save one.
That is why this rule is necessary. And that is why I am pleased that Congress fulfilled my request to restore it. Last night, I signed the “pay as you go” rule into law. Now, Congress will have to pay for what it spends, just like everybody else.
But that’s not all we must do. Even as we make critical investments to create jobs today and lay a foundation for growth tomorrow – by cutting taxes for small businesses, investing in education, promoting clean energy, and modernizing our roads and railways – we have to continue to go through the budget line by line, looking for ways to save. We have to cut where we can, to afford what we need.
This year, I’ve proposed another $20 billion in budget cuts. And I’ve also called for a freeze in government spending for three years. It won’t affect benefits through Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security. And it will not affect national security – including benefits for veterans. But it will affect the rest of the budget.
Finally, I’ve proposed a bipartisan Fiscal Commission to provide recommendations for long-term deficit reduction. Because in the end, solving our fiscal challenge – so many years in the making – will take both parties coming together, putting politics aside, and making some hard choices about what we need to spend, and what we don’t. It will not happen any other way. Unfortunately this proposal – which received the support of a bipartisan majority in the Senate – was recently blocked. So, I will be creating this commission by executive order.
After a decade of profligacy, the American people are tired of politicians who talk the talk but don’t walk the walk when it comes to fiscal responsibility. It’s easy to get up in front of the cameras and rant against exploding deficits. What’s hard is actually getting deficits under control. But that’s what we must do. Like families across the country, we have to take responsibility for every dollar we spend. And with the return of “pay as you go,” as well as other steps we’ve begun to take, that is exactly what we are doing.
Here’s a brief little interview I did with China Radio International (CRI) about a week ago, which I didn’t realize was up on the Internet. It’s about Shanghai’s aspirations to become a global financial center, and some of the challenges it must overcome to do so. I also discuss the rivalry between Shanghai and Hong Kong, a topic that I briefly mentioned in my “Nine Nations of China” article in The Atlantic. Hong Kong is the leading city in the region I call “The Back Door.” Separated by distance, culture, and language from China’s “core,” the Back Door has always served as an arm’s length point of interaction with the outside world, and a zone of experimentation. Shanghai, on the other hand, is the leading city of the region I call “The Metropolis” — the cosmopolitan and commercial heart of China, which has served several times as the nation’s capital. As I noted in The Atlantic: “The Back Door may succeed in breaking the rules, but only the Metropolis has the wealth and dynamism to entirely reshape them.” The Back Door’s (and Hong Kong’s) flexibility gives it the first-mover advantage as a financial center. But it is always looking over its shoulder as the more powerful and strategically central Metropolis (Shanghai) adapts and tries to catch up. This regional rivalry provides the historical backdrop to the more specific points I discuss in the interview.
The aftermath of our latest economic downturn, has caused many a corporations to revitalize their internal structures and re-shifting of personnel and re-structuring of groups.
The “individual” is a risk to an entity, be it from its immediate actions or retroactive events. When vested with the “credentials” of the held position, an individual takes on the unspoken responsibility of being a representation of the entities to which he/she belong to.
Thus an individual is viewed as both an asset and as a risk to such entity, which takes on a new perspective how entities will view the role of their workers and their affairs.
The human being as a social animal seeks the need to interact and socialize with others, and in such manner how entities will view and interpret such interactions can in its whole determine the representation of the entity as itself and the individuals’ reciprocation towards its employer.
Today’s market behavior is a reflection of how an entity views itself and its employees, thus portraying and handling its business endeavors in a manner that shows its corporate culture.
“A chain is only as strong as its weakest link”, an overused proverb that rings true in this case. Why?
With the necessity to minimize its ‘exposure’ to outside factors within its infrastructure an entity must regulate and deregulate its own personnel, this means the individual. Topics of conversations and their context have every entity running scared and hushing up rumors of corporate control and “dictatorship”.
The who is who? What is being said? And to whom it is being said? Operational models are in a re-structuring phase after the aftermath of the economic collapse, inciting the need for change and for self assessment above all.
The assumption that all models are infallible is up to individual preferences, or is it? What might work for one organization may not be suitable to another, within the same sector of business. The need is to cater to each and every entity with personal care. The actions of individuals within the corporate infrastructure are what can set up a success or a failure, thus the need for models that address the issue of methodological individualism.
Models need to be created, modified, adapted or even all together extinguished, in order to set up “alarm systems” able to identify the risks and patterns of behavior, which will allows at the same time for courses of action to be activated and executed.
These matters leads us to believe that when hiring employees, especially at middle to higher management levels, and entity taking its core infrastructure in account should not only emphasize the need to rely on the corporate etiquette, code of ethics and “good business” philosophy, but at the same time create a new idea and implement it as “rational choice theory”. (…)
** if you like this discussion please feel free to download the whole document at box.net
Japan is on the way of reform. The Democratic Party defeated the Liberal Democratic Party in the election in July and become the majority party. Yukio Hatoyama assumed the premiership. He said, “The most important thing is the life of the nations”. He has the belief in “fraternity”. That word symbolizes him. And he has changed many things since the election. Now, prime minister, Yukio Hatoyama and The Democratic Party have many supports, but I sometimes think some policies of The Democratic Party are not right.
A few days ago, I watch in the news about the classification of business on the TV. Many people were interested in that policy, so there were many spectators to hear about the meeting. Many businesses were abolished or reviewed after the budgets. But then, I thought some decisions went wrong.
The expense of strengthening the athletes is one of the reduced budget. Many athletes protested against this decision. A member of the Diet said, “The purpose of Olympic Games is to participating, not to winning medals.” It is not false, but I think that these expenses should not be reduced. Athletes are the whole nation’s heroes or heroines. All athletes ought to work to strengthen themselves and get a medal. And they try hard to win the match. I have been given many impressions and hopes by Japanese athletes. They showed me great performances. If the expenses of strengthening the athlete are reduced, the opportunity that we can be excited by sports may decrease. And children may lose the interest to be an athlete who is their heroes . Today, the depression of economy in Japan is very serious. But, athletes will make us happy through their performances. And after the war, athletes like Hironoshin Huruhashi cheered Japan by the sports lovers. Like this, sports have many good points. I think that expense should not be reduced.
The expense of science study was also decided to be reduced. A lot of members of Diet said, “This budget is so costly that it is suffering on the finance of Japan.” Some professors and Novel prize winners complained about this decision. They said, “Today, the power of science makes our lives so successful.” I think so too. In fact, we use many a powers of science in our daily lives –robotics, biotechnology, etc. And, Japan has great skills for many fields so our country must lead the world. Money is necessary to develop the science. If that budget is reduced, many young scientists will be in trouble about their studies because of a lack of money.
To reduce the waste of money is surely important, but, I think The Democratic Party’s ways to cut down the budgets are too assertive. They should speculate about the way and substance of that reduction. When I watched the news at first, I thought that they were trying only to reduce the budget. Many people object to those decisions. So I think The Democratic Party ought to reconsider it.
The problem of American bases at Okinawa is another subject for The Democratic Party. People in Okinawa want The Democratic Party to move Futenma base as soon as possible. Prime minister Hatoyama said that Futenma base will be moved within a year, but it may be impossible. I think the government should take some measure onthis problem. This is both chance and crisis for Yukio Hatoyama and The Democratic Party.
I expect The Democratic Party to change this country. Many people also expect them do so. I want them to meet the nation’s requirements and make Japan better. They should have confidence in their acts, but must not forget that they have responsibility.
Colorado Springs cuts into services considered basic by many
By Michael Booth
The Denver Post
Posted: 01/31/2010 01:00:00 AM MST
Updated: 02/03/2010 04:39:29 PM MST
COLORADO SPRINGS — This tax-averse city is about to learn what it looks and feels like when budget cuts slash services most Americans consider part of the urban fabric.
More than a third of the streetlights in Colorado Springs will go dark Monday. The police helicopters are for sale on the Internet. The city is dumping firefighting jobs, a vice team, burglary investigators, beat cops — dozens of police and fire positions will go unfilled.
The parks department removed trash cans last week, replacing them with signs urging users to pack out their own litter.
Neighbors are encouraged to bring their own lawn mowers to local green spaces, because parks workers will mow them only once every two weeks. If that.
Water cutbacks mean most parks will be dead, brown turf by July; the flower and fertilizer budget is zero.
City recreation centers, indoor and outdoor pools, and a handful of museums will close for good March 31 unless they find private funding to stay open. Buses no longer run on evenings and weekends. The city won’t pay for any street paving, relying instead on a regional authority that can meet only about 10 percent of the need.
“I guess we’re going to find out what the tolerance level is for people,” said businessman Chuck Fowler, who is helping lead a private task force brainstorming for city budget fixes. “It’s a new day.”
Some residents are less sanguine, arguing that cuts to bus services, drug enforcement and treatment and job development are attacks on basic needs for the working class.
“How are people supposed to live? We’re not a ‘Mayberry R.F.D.’ anymore,” said Addy Hansen, a criminal justice student who has spoken out about safety cuts. “We’re the second-largest city, and growing, in Colorado. We’re in trouble. We’re in big trouble.”
Mayor flinches at revenue
Colorado Springs’ woes are more visceral versions of local and state cuts across the nation. Denver has cut salaries and human services workers, trimmed library hours and raised fees; Aurora shuttered four libraries; the state budget has seen round after round of wholesale cuts in education and personnel.
The deep recession bit into Colorado Springs sales-tax collections, while pension and health care costs for city employees continued to soar. Sales-tax updates have become a regular exercise in flinching for Mayor Lionel Rivera.
“Every month I open it up, and I look for a plus in front of the numbers instead of a minus,” he said. The 2010 sales-tax forecast is almost $22 million less than 2007.
Voters in November said an emphatic no to a tripling of property tax that would have restored $27.6 million to the city’s $212 million general fund budget. Fowler and many other residents say voters don’t trust city government to wisely spend a general tax increase and don’t believe the current cuts are the only way to balance a budget.
Dead grass, dark streets
But the 2010 spending choices are complete, and local residents and businesses are preparing for a slew of changes:
• The steep parks and recreation cuts mean a radical re-shifting of resources from more than 100 neighborhood parks to a few popular regional parks. The city cut watering drastically in 2009 but “got lucky” with weekly summer rains, said parks maintenance manager Kurt Schroeder.
With even more watering cuts, “if we repeat the weather of 2008, we’re at risk of losing every bit of turf we have in our neighborhood parks,” Schroeder said. Six city greenhouses are shut down. The city spent $19.6 million on parks in 2007; this year it will spend $3.1 million.
“If a playground burns down, I can’t replace it,” Schroeder said. Park fans’ only hope is the possibility of a new ballot tax pledged to recreation spending that might win over skeptical voters.
• Community center and pool closures have parents worried about day-care costs, idle teenagers and shut-in grandparents with nowhere to go.
Hillside Community Center, on the southeastern edge of downtown Colorado Springs in a low- to moderate-income neighborhood, is scrambling to find private partners to stay open. Moms such as Kirsten Williams doubt they can replace Hillside’s dedicated staff and preschool rates of $200 for six-week sessions.
“It’s affordable, the program is phenomenal, and the staff all grew up here,” Williams said. “You can’t re-create that kind of magic.”
Shutting down youth services is shortsighted, she argues. “You’re going to pay now, or you’re going to pay later. There’s trouble if kids don’t have things to do.”
• Though officials and citizens put public safety above all in the budget, police and firefighting still lost more than $5.5 million this year. Positions that will go empty range from a domestic violence specialist to a deputy chief to juvenile offender officers. Fire squad 108 loses three firefighters. Putting the helicopters up for sale and eliminating the officers and a mechanic banked $877,000.
• Tourism outlets have attacked budget choices that hit them precisely as they’re struggling to draw choosy visitors to the West.
The city cut three economic-development positions, land-use planning, long-range strategic planning and zoning and neighborhood inspectors. It also repossessed a large portion of a dedicated lodgers and car rental tax rather than transfer it to the visitors’ bureau.
“It’s going to hurt. If they don’t at least market Colorado Springs, it doesn’t get the people here,” said Nancy Stovall, owner of Pine Creek Art Gallery on the tourism strip of Old Colorado City. Other states, such as New Mexico and Wyoming, will continue to market, and tourism losses will further erode city sales-tax revenue, merchants say.
• Turning out the lights, literally, is one of the high-profile trims aggravating some residents. The city-run Colorado Springs Utilities will shut down 8,000 to 10,000 of more than 24,000 streetlights, to save $1.2 million in energy and bulb replacement.
Hansen, the criminal-justice student, grows especially exasperated when recalling a scary incident a few years ago as she waited for a bus. She said a carload of drunken men approached her until the police helicopter that had been trailing them turned a spotlight on the men and chased them off. Now the helicopter is gone, and the streetlight she was waiting under is threatened as well.
“I don’t know a person in this city who doesn’t think that’s just the stupidest thing on the planet,” Hansen said. “Colorado Springs leaders put patches on problems and hope that will handle it.”
Employee pay criticized
Community business leaders have jumped into the budget debate, some questioning city spending on what they see as “Ferrari”-level benefits for employees and high salaries in middle management. Broadmoor luxury resort chief executive Steve Bartolin wrote an open letter asking why the city spends $89,000 per employee, when his enterprise has a similar number of workers and spends only $24,000 on each.
Businessman Fowler, saying he is now speaking for the task force Bartolin supports, said the city should study the Broadmoor’s use of seasonal employees and realistic manager pay.
“I don’t know if people are convinced that the water needed to be turned off in the parks, or the trash cans need to come out, or the lights need to go off,” Fowler said. “I think we’ll have a big turnover in City Council a year from April. Until we get a new group in there, people aren’t really going to believe much of anything.”
Mayor and council are part-time jobs in Colorado Springs, points out Mayor Rivera, that pay $6,250 a year ($250 extra for the mayor). “We have jobs, we pay taxes, we use services, just like they do,” Rivera said, acknowledging there is a “level of distrust” of public officials at many levels.
Rivera said he welcomes help from Bartolin, the private task force and any other source volunteering to rethink government. He is slightly encouraged, for now, that his monthly sales-tax reports are just ahead of budget predictions.
Officials across the city know their phone lines will light up as parks go brown, trash gathers in the weeds, and streets and alleys go dark.
“There’s a lot of anger, a lot of frustration about how governments spend their money,” Rivera said. “It’s not unique to Colorado Springs.”
Michael Booth: 303-954-1686 or mbooth@denverpost.com
Here we go again. Once more the corporate-controlled shills of government and media join together to sell us baloney that they claim is sirloin steak. This time they are praising to the heavens the December jobless figures that supposedly show a “surprising” decline in unemployment, which purportedly proves the economy is on the mend. Here’s one of the articles. While even this particular write-up isn’t loony enough to try and sound tremendously optimistic, what with its multiple caveats, it still omits mention of what I’m sure is the true explanation for December’s unemployment drop. I’m no economist but even I know what it is. Do you? It’s the same factor that accounts for increased employment every December and then reverses in January: holiday season hiring.
Is there anyone, I mean besides those who nowadays pass for “journalists” and “government leaders,” who doesn’t know that businesses hoping to milk the end-of-the-year shopping binge often hire extra workers? And after said binge ends on New Year’s Day, generally so too does the holiday hiree’s job?
But what the heck, the important thing is to pull wool over the eyes of at least some of the people. Get a quick boost for the stock market and temporarily back-off the pressure from those who demand action to get some job growth. The unemployment problem is solving itself. Whoopee! Prosperity is just around the corner (to coin a phrase).
Prediction: Come March, when the January unemployment numbers come out and they are higher than they were in November, our dear “journalists” and “government leaders” will be blindsided at the news. They will then do their best to once-again put a positive spin on the continuing disaster.
When January unemployment figures soar, will our ‘leaders” then take bold action to address the issue of joblessness? Of course not. For they know that soon the unemployment numbers will show a huge improvement. And why is that? Because millions of jobless people have been jobless so long that within these next few months they will exhaust their unemployment payments. And you want to hear something crazy? The U.S. government’s official way of counting unemployment doesn’t count you unless you are collecting unemployment payments. In other words, you can be jobless but if you aren’t getting unemployment payments then you aren’t “unemployed.”
Have you ever wondered, “What is going on?” Things we once took for granted or as fundamental are now assaulted due to changes we are still struggling to understand and comprehend. Events over the last 16 months are a bit confusing. For most, the future looks a bit unstable and uncertain at nearly all levels. Confidence in our leaders, both nationally, state-wide, and locally is very low and in question. There are no new ideas anywhere. Some embrace an undefinable belief that “things” will return to “normalcy” soon – somehow.
Yet what is normal any more? Is it normal for over 10% of our state and nation to remain unemployed; higher in many areas of this country? There are predictions that unemployment in Georgia will rise to nearly 11% within a year. Nationally, that percentage could continue to rise even higher regardless of the current 9.7% unemployment rate.
Is it normal for families and their children to go to bed hungry? Many local food banks are distributing more food than ever before as demand spikes - even here in Fayette County. This is America – the breadbasket of the world. Hunger should never be a problem, but uncomfortably, it is becoming so.
Is it now normal that we distrust government, our neighbors, and those that have and those that don’t? Why should we distrust others? Because unfortunately we don’t speak truthfully to each other any longer. We are now afraid that we will offend someone and be thought less of by doing so. The truth is no one “thinks” about you as much as they think themselves. We are all more prone to consider our own needs and wants than someone else. This is part of the problem We don’t take time to listen to others; to consider them of equal value; to offer a helping hand and to express love for one another. Some do for the right reasons while others. Others do so simply for political gain and to secure power. May we offend each other with truth while offering our understanding and love. If you don’t know the truth, then find out. If you don’t understand love, then turn to GOD.
That’s me. Enemy of the people. I must be. Why? I watched and listened to the entire Sarah Palin “National tea party” speech. Populism, conservative style, apparently doesn’t touch me the same way that liberal populism does. Why? Well, from what I saw, there were equal parts Ad hominem attacks that were just as untrue as they were giggle out loud stupid. The same worn out crap the right has pulled, about Democrats making America less safe, when the right has no corner on the “We kept America safe” market.
Apparently she doesn’t remember 9/11. Dummy. And how many Americans were kept safe in Iraq? Ask those honored war dead who died their, in a war that did nothing to slow down, stop or end terrorism, and made Al-Qaeda stronger, and gave Al-qaeda an effective marketing tool to make more people terrorists. Over 4,000 dead for a false vision of strength.
When we fight in Afghanistan, the war you on the right oppose, we fight Al-Qaeda, the enemy the neocons didn’t have the nerve to fight when Bush was in office.
There was talk about restarting the health care debate, this time with input from the right. Surprising, seeing how a there were parts of the bill that were suggested by republicans. It’s not like they had no input they did. They had plenty of time to read the various bills, but she made the same old tired right wing main stream media claims about them not having any input.
She actually tried to co-opt left wing energy policy talking points by saying we need to get all types of energy production. No crowds yelling “DRILL, BABY, DRILL”. No talk of drilling offshore. There was talk of more nuclear power, and she said it was nice that the Obama administration to talk about it, but we need more than talk.
Indeed, we do. From you AND him. From Sarah Palin, talk is cheap and easy, she has no power, no responsibility, and therefor anything she says comes from the safety of the sideline. The President talks from the vantage point of having the capacity to do something about what he says. His words have meaning, consequence. Sarah’s don’t. It’s that simple.
There was a lot of empty rhetoric, as would be expected from a meeting of neocons and their political cronies putting a fresh paint job on the conservative movement in America, with the hearty support of the right wing main stream media.
She did have some points to make, and she made them, but they were points that, to be honest didn’t touch me. I’ve heard all the points she made before. She, and the tea party “Patriots”, are nothing more than conservatives trying to rebrand themselves. That is not surprising really. The fact that Feb. 6th , the day of the speech, would have been Ronald Reagan’s 99th birthday was referenced at least 7 times in the speech and the talk afterwards.
Sarah referenced Reagan’s “shining city on the hill” while I happen to remember that time as being a bad one. New York was riddled with crime. The big cities of America were in bad shape. It was the era of crack and burgeoning inner city crime. The crime and drug problems that this nation had when they were at their worst were when this nation was busy being Reagan’s “Shining city on the Hill”, and anyone who tells you different is clearly in the employ of the right wing main stream media.
So when I hear of Reagan, I don’t think pretty thoughts about America in it’s prime. I see America as it shouldn’t be. You can talk all you like about the current administration’s spending being out of control, and the current administration being out of touch because of the spending, but this administration would not be in the position it is in right now without the excesses of conservatism and of men like Ronald Reagan.
A liberal flag
And when neocons and the right wing main stream media tell me that they have a vision of America, I really have to laugh. We have seen this vision played out, and we are suffering the results of it. And if Sarah and the Tea Party “Patriots” want that era back, they’ll have to do it with the knowledge that they themselves, and those who believe as they do, are responsible for the bleak economic world we are living in.
And there is a reason I put “Patriots” in quotes. Conservatives do not have a corner on the Patriotism market, never have, never will. There are very patriotic liberals, and i dare say they are at least as patriotic as the average conservative. We on the left have something in common with the right as far as patriotism goes, we care about our country, we care about the future of America, and we want to make sure that this country is strong enough to ensure our future and the future of our children and our children’s children. We, both liberal and conservative are soldiers, we are laborers, we are the backbone of America. But we have differences.
Liberals do not hide behind the flag and spout platitudes about love of country, while fighting against the freedom we claim to love so much. No liberal has ever tried the subtle subterfuge of getting the constitution amended to make flag burning and gay marriage unconstitutional. No real American would willingly ban free speech or the ability to marry to anyone. Remember that bit in the pledge of allegiance?
“With liberty and justice, for all.” Notice it doesn’t say “for some” or “for whoever we want to have it” ALL.
The tea party “patriots” and Sarah Palin and the rest of the old guard conservatives masquerading as some new force on the scene need to learn that. We are ALL Americans.
Have a good night. Get a good nights sleep and get ready to watch the Super bowl.
Today’s nuggets, via wikiquote: The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil Constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors: they purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or to be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men. Samuel Adams
Men love their country, not because it is great, but because it is their own. Seneca
Here are a collection of thoughts for what will be the last Saturday of freedom until June:
The Shock of a New Semester
On Tuesday, we will begin the spring semester here at Asbury Theological Seminary. This will be the sixth semester, here, and it will be an interesting one to say the least. First, many of our friends will be graduating come May, so we will be saying goodbye to some good friends.
Second, I think I have bitten off more than I can chew for one semester. I am taking a grand total of five classes. I keep telling myself that at least one of the classes only meets on one day, however that doesn’t help. The amount of work that I will have for the semester borders on insane and is equaled to crazy. This should put the new semester into perspective: I’ve been reading since early January and have finished one book, but I feel behind. How can you feel behind before a new semester even begins?
I’m looking forward to the semester. I got into most of the classes that I wanted, but there is one that I did not get into that I hope to take some other time. The topics for the semester are: preaching, Christian discipleship, the environment, cross-cultural communication, and Methodist history. I will be … busy.
But, I will learn and enjoy it.
Latest Job Numbers Do Not Bring Hope to Jobless
The unemployment number is down. Good news, right? The unemployment number went from 10 percent to 9.7 percent, that should be cause for praise, right?
Oh, how we wish it were.
While the unemployment number did go down, still 20,000 nonfarm jobs were lost in the previous month. While that is less than December’s 150,000 jobs, it still means that, as a country, we are losing jobs instead of creating jobs. Also, too, what some consider to be the true unemployment rate still remains high. Some argue that it is best to use the figure that includes both those actively looking for a job and those that are no longer looking for work. That rate, while it fell too in January, is still above 16 percent.
That means more than 1 out of 10 people who are of working age are not working. They are not providing for their families. This, I believe, is more than a political and economic issue, but an issue that touches are humanity. Work is a central part of who we are, and we can trace that to Genesis and God’s command for humanity to serve as stewards among all the earth. We are called to work and work is important for us. It is how we express our gifts and talents, provide for our families, and in some ways give something back to those around us.
We can get into arguments that we need to address how we view work, and accept that volunteering is a proper avenue for work (though it doesn’t help pay the bills). And while those are important discussions to have, I’m not sure now is the time. What is the time is that we must no longer see the jobs number as a political football between two parties wanting to be in the best position come November. Instead, we must see this issue on the personal level and how it affects families and individuals.
I don’t believe we are looking at it that way. At least, not now and that hurts those families who are looking for a job in this economy.
Today’s New York Times had an interesting article about the after effects of being unemployed. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/us/06return.html)
I am professionally interested in the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that people are feeling in the workplace and see working on it as key to unlocking organizational ills. Those who are left behind are bitter for having to do three peoples’ jobs, worry that they will get laid off next, and distrust the leadership who can’t seem to make them feel secure about the organization no matter how hard they try. Up against the global economic collapse, leaders find themselves manning the bilge pumps and fending off mutinies, all while keeping what may feel like a rudderless ship afloat. Those who were laid off have the anxiety of not being able to pay their bills. And it all seemed neat and tidy; address the grief and loss of the organization as a whole, assist in creating agile and transparent systems which have resilience and adaptability.
However, in this article, the trauma that once-laid-off-newly-re-employed workers bring to their next job is discussed.
So another dimension of PTSD is introduced. We need to, then, deal with the systemic trauma on four levels: 1) leaders, 2) survivors, 3) unemployed, *and* 4) the re-employed. In moving forward out of the “great recession” there are going to be many people who have been out of work for even two years perhaps, whose lives were turned upside down and for whom there may be years of economic recovery in store.
Reminds me of that scene in the original Jaws, when Brody first sees the shark. “We’re gonna need a bigger boat.” Indeed.
We got a look at what could be for tomorrow, but unfortunately, there wasn’t enough there to give any real indication as to what tomorrow will look like.
Initial claims and continuing claims came in largely unchanged for the week.
I have a feeling that employment numbers are likely to do exactly the same thing tomorrow, largely unchanged for the month-over-month.
Washington DC is full of idiots but the three dumbest politicians in Washington DC today are Nancy Pelosi,Barack Obama and Eric Holder.The trial of terrorist IN NEW YORK like KSM as well as investigations of our own CIA for abuse of terrorist and the bungled underwear bomber case justify the immediate resignation of Holder on the basis of incompetence.Obama is at fault for being dumb enough to listen to both of these idiots and Pelosi who is spending money like there is no end on transportation for herself and staff roughly 500k per month add in Copenhagen which could double that and 100k for booze looks like this dumb ass is the problem not the solution.America has many good leaders as well as those that are a dangerous threat to democracy the three listed above have no place in the free world.
(GREEK NEWS AGENDA) The Institute of Classical, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies of the Tbilisi State University has undertaken the initiative to compile the first Modern Greek-Georgian Dictionary, containing 50,000 words. The project was funded by the Kostas and Eleni Ourani Foundation.
The Greek element has been present in Georgia since antiquity. The first trips had commercial purpose and within years, the first cultural enclaves were established.
The two early Georgian kingdoms of late antiquity were known to ancient Greeks as Iberia in the east and Colchis in the West.
The Western part was strongly influenced by Greek culture – as evidenced in Greek mythology and the story of Jason seeking the Golden Fleece in Colchis – and the eastern part by the Persians.
Greeks in Georgia established ties with the Byzantine Empire, building on a common religious background.
Until recently (1989), the Greek community in Georgia counted some 100,000 residents, but nowadays the population totals between 15,000- 20,000.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Greeks in Georgia; Photo: “The Argonauts”, a publication by the Institute of Classical, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies of the Tbilisi State University.
A decade of war in Afghanistan has tried to reconfigure the politics of West Asia. Some powers have tried to rearrange the geography and the boundaries. Some in Delhi had hoped that Pakistan would give up its dreams and allow existential threats to cloud its strategic objectives.
Obviously that has not happened.
General Kiyani has once again reiterated the Pakistan’s strategic depth lies in Afghanistan. However that did not mean that Pakistan wanted to control Kabul.
“We want a strategic depth in Afghanistan but do not want to control it,”
“A peaceful and friendly Afghanistan can provide Pakistan a strategic depth.”
This means that the Bharati (aka Indian) policy of death by a thousand cuts has not deterred the Pakistani resolve to ensure that the Western flank of Pakistan is free of enemies, and that the Hindu Kush mountains continue to provide depth to Pakistan’s strategic objective.
The Strategic Depth has been dicussed threadbare in Islamabad and in foreign capitals. However this is the first time that a Pakistani Army General has overtly and publicly announced the policy. It is pedagogical to note that the announcement was made in the earshot of NATO, ISAF and US Generals.
It is not a pure coincidence that Pakistan’s overt announcement was made right after the regional conference on Afghanistan which did not include Bharat (aka India). It is poignant to comprehend that Bharat got a seat on the second row at the London conference on Afghanistan–clearly defining its exclusion from a role in Kabul. An angry and incensed Delhi lodged a protest with Turkey, but could not change the mind of the several dozen countries which over ruled Bharati objections on accommodating the Taliban in Kabul.
What was said was important. However what is even more important was what was not said. Mr. Karzai did not object to Bharati exclusion from the conference in Istanbul. Mr. Karzai is fighting a battle for his political survival. He knows that his days in Kabul are numbered. The brazen attacks on Kabul and Helmand are a clear warning sign to his last days in Kabul. Mr. Karzai clearly knows which side his bread is buttered on. Any chance of reconciliation with the Taliban depends on good relations with Pakistan.
The Washington Post clearly recognizes the potential of the Pakistan Army to do the job.
Pakistan has one of the largest and best-equipped conventional armies in the world, with a force of nearly half a million. Washington Post. Pakistan’s army chief seeks stable Afghanistan By Pamela Constable. Tuesday, February 2, 2010
The White House is increasing financial and military aid to Pakistan–showing approval of Islamabad’s help in bringing peace to Kabul.
“This is key to improving stability and will also provide the military the tools needed to wage an effective counterterrorist campaign. For Fiscal 2011, funding for Pakistan is $ 3.2 billion,” he said, adding that in 2010 it has been $ 1.88 billion.
“For Pakistan, the Budget also increases security assistance and funds a new signature energy project,” the White House
There is a clear recognition that the occupation of Afghanistan is in the last stages.
The London conference was also all about making it clear that the West’s intensive commitment to Afghanistan is going to be short-lived.
In 18 months US troops will start handing over responsibility to the Afghan army, province by province, and start withdrawing. BBC
General Kiyan’s comments are apt and perfectly timed.
RAWALPINDI: Chief of the Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani said on Monday the success of military operations in the tribal regions have caused substantial decline in cross-border attacks on Nato forces in Afghanistan and warned that it was essential to address Pakistan’s long-term strategic concerns for stability in the region.
In a rare press briefing, General Kayani said it would be a cause of worry for Pakistan if Afghanistan’s projected army developed the potential to take on Pakistan.
“We want a strategic depth in Afghanistan but do not want to control it,” the general said while talking to a group of journalists at the Army General Headquarters.
“A peaceful and friendly Afghanistan can provide Pakistan a strategic depth.” He asked the US and Nato to come out with a clear strategy on Afghanistan. Kayani spells out terms for regional stability By Zahid Hussain Tuesday, 02 Feb, 2010
General Kiyani’s clear enunciation of strategic depth as a corner stone of Pakistani policy was made after his meeting with NATO commanders. It is incomprehensible that the Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA) would announce a strategic decision without the total approval of NATO, ISAF and the US. President Obama’s approval of a $1.2 billion military aid package to Pakistan is a clarion call to Pakistan to help the US save face and exit from Afghanistan.
What is even more important for West Asia is the Pakistani offer of training the Afghan National Army, which would ostensibly be merged with the Taliban fighters who sign the peace treaty. This offer is a sign of the times–specially since Delhi’s similar offer was politely refused by Defence Secretary Bob Gates.
General Kayani who last week participated in Nato commanders’ conference in Brussels said Pakistan was prepared to train the Afghan National Army which would help improve relations between the two nations. He said he hoped the offer would get a positive response.
“If we get more involved with the ANA (Afghan National Army) there’s more interaction and better understanding,” General Kayani said.
“We have opened all doors … It’s a win-win for Afghanistan, the United States, Isaf and Pakistan,” he said, referring to Nato’s International Security Assistance Force.
He said he believed it would take at least four years to achieve a target of a 140,000-strong Afghan force able to take over security responsibilities. Kayani spells out terms for regional stability By Zahid Hussain Tuesday, 02 Feb, 2010
There is a huge realization in the international community about Paksitan’s role in Afghanistan.
“There will be no peace in this region unless Pakistan carries its share of responsibility,” Merkel told German weekly Welt am Sonntag.
“For a comprehensive solution, we need a much greater involvement of Afghan authorities and the inclusion of neighbouring countries, in particular Pakistan.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel
Even Pakistanphobic analysts have now begun to realize the importance of Paksitani assistance in Afghanistan.
it is Pakistan that is planning to bring the Taliban and Afghan government together for peace talks. Karzai explicitly asked for support from Afghanistan’s neighbors, especially Pakistan, in bringing stability to his nation. Harsh V. Pant teaches in King’s College London and is a Visiting Fellow at the Center for the Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania. -
The ball is rolling and momentum is building on the Saudi initiative that started in 2008
The Karzai government’s attempts to engage the Taliban leadership are proceeding fast, and the United Nations and Afghan parliamentarians are making separate efforts toward a political settlement to end the violence.
Karzai will meet Saudi King Abdullah this week to ask him to aid the peace process, according to presidential spokesman Siamak Herawi. The Saudis held secret talks between the Afghan government and figures associated with the Taliban in 2008. Miami Herald. By SAEED SHAH McClatchy Newspapers
Pakistan’s new found confidence is based on a tactical and strategic alliance with Iran, China and Turkey. This is based on guartantees to Iran on the Shias in Iran and confluence of Islamabad-Teheran interests in West Asia.
on Saturday January 16, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran inked a regional pact to confront the Afghan insurgency trilaterally and rejected a British proposal to include countries which were not contiguous to Afghanistan, but agreed to include all those that were, namely Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and China. Washington works the Af-Pak-India triangle By Zahid U Kramet
Pakistan is now offering military assistance to Kabul–which will not only help Mr. Karzai–it will bring stability to the region and allow the Americans to leave Afghanistan in a proper withdrawal rather than a hasty retreat
Pakistan has raised concern over a similar offer by India to train Afghan army, and the issue could become another point of conflict between the two South Asian neighbours.
Pakistan’s offer reflects Islamabad’s rising concern over Indian influence in Afghanistan. “Our strategic paradigm needs to be fully realised,” General Kayani said.
He warned that an environment hostile to Pakistan could strain its battle against militancy and extremism. He said he had conveyed the concerns and constraints of Pakistan to the Nato allies.
“There are some key issues of the conflict that needed to be fully understood and addressed.”
He said there was a need for realisation of Pakistan’s key regional position and its contribution in the war. Kayani spells out terms for regional stability By Zahid Hussain Tuesday, 02 Feb, 2010
General Kiyani’s doctrine is Pakistan’s Monroe Doctrine. Afghanistan is clearly part and parcel of Pakistan’s sphere of influence and Bharat has been told by almost all concerned to lay-off. The Kiyani Doctrine is similar to the Zia Doctrine which clearly described Pakistan’s sphere of influence from the Indus to the Oxus and beyond. Dushanbe and Fergana are part of the ECO neural network which is being strengthed by thousands of miles of roads and rails connecting the ancestral lands of Babur and Taimur to the people of the Indus in Pakistan
General Kayani said more than 140,000 Pakistani troops were now involved in fighting militants in the northwest and deployment along the Afghan border.
He said over the last seven months Pakistani military had launched 209 major and 510 minor operations in 10 regions. He said 2,273 Pakistani army officers and soldiers had been killed in the fighting so far.
General Kayani said that the military operations in South Waziristan and Swat were at present in a transitory phase — from hold to build. “We must consolidate our gains and fully stabilise the area secured lest it fall back to the terrorists,” he said.
He warned against losing sight for future operations. “Public opinion, media support, army’s capability and resolve are fundamental to our war,” he said.
General Kayani rejected the perception that Pakistan did not want to take on the militants in North Waziristan. “There is already one army division deployed there and we have taken action whenever required,” he declared
He said it was important that the military consolidated its hold in South Waziristan and other tribal regions before starting another army offensive.
Last October the army launched a major offensive in South Waziristan which had become the main bastion of Pakistani Taliban movement and Al Qaeda.
More than 30,000 troops have been involved in the operation which is said to be the biggest since Pakistan joined the US war on terror after September 11, 2001.
The troops have cleared most of the region, but there are still pockets of resistance. Many Taliban commanders have taken refuge in neighbouring Waziristan. “We have broken the myth that Waziristan cannot be controlled,” he said.
The London Conference was focused on the West’s withdrawal from Afghanistan. From the ISAF, NATO and US perspective, all roads to peace in Kabul lead through Afghanistan
The London conference [...] conference has united the international community for a further commitment to Afghanistan’s future – albeit for a shortened period.
Even more significant, there is broad agreement that talking to the Taliban is the only way to bring the insurgency to an end.
No longer are the US, Nato or Afghanistan’s neighbours talking about militarily defeating the Taliban, rebuilding the country from top to bottom or promoting democracy.
Nato is perceived to be ‘not winning’ or at best stalemated in the war against the Taliban
Instead there is a single purpose in mind – how to end the war and provide sufficient security for the people so that development can take place, while at the same time allow foreign forces to leave. BBC
General Kiyani clearly defined the boundaries of US advice to Pakistan
Pakistan has been facing mounting pressure from the United States to start army operation in North Waziristan which is the base for another Taliban faction.
The US and western intelligence agencies believe the area is also a base of Afghan insurgents led by Sirajuddin Haqqani. Pakistan had signed a peace deal with the Taliban faction in 2006.
General Kayani said Pakistani military’s success in South Waziristan had sent a strong message to the militants operating in North Waziristan and other areas.
“There is, however, no need at this point to start a stream roller operation in North Waziristan.”
The army chief said the large number of casualties suffered by the Pakistani security forces and economic losses had not dented the armed forces’ resolve to fight terrorism and violent extremism. “We will fight and finish the terrorism in our own interest,” General Kayani said.
He said the intelligence sharing and greater cooperation between Pakistani military and US forces had helped improve the situation. “The regular contacts between Pakistani and US military commanders have greatly helped in understanding each others’ position.” Kayani spells out terms for regional stability By Zahid Hussain Tuesday, 02 Feb, 2010
The Pakistan ISI is indespensible–specially if peace is the objective in Afghanistan.
Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) has had close relations with the Afghan Taliban, since they were given sanctuary by Pakistan’s military regime after their defeat in 2001.
The ISI are the gate-keepers for access to most Taliban leaders, giving it considerable clout in any future negotiations…BBC
There is a qualitative and quantitative difference between Bharati interests and Pakistani interests in Afghanistan. Bharati interests in Afghanistan is to give Delhi a second front–it is a negative, coercive, expansionist and offensive interest that perpetuates hegemony. The Pakistani interest is cultural, religious, and defensive in nature. Pakistan is the mother ship for all Pakhtuns. 40 million live in the country. Karachi is the largest Pakhtun city in the world–not Kabul. More than twice the number of Pakhtuns live in Pakistan than those who live in Afghanistan. Most of the Afghan Pakhtuns were born in Pakistan–especially in the 90s when more than 3 million lived as refugees in Pakistan. Even now more than a million Afghans live in Quetta-which give wind to the ephemeral Quetta Shura.
It is obvious that Pakistan support the Pakhtuns in Afghanistan. Wild horses could not hold the Pakistani Pakhtuns from helping the Afghan Pakhtuns most of which were born in Pakistan anyway. The bonds of tribes and kinship are a lot stronger than Dollars from Delhi (most of which were spent on Indian contractors working in Afghanistan).
Bharat will not give up Afghanistan easily. She will stand up to Turkey and protest. She will plead with NATO and ISAF. She will strong arm Karzai, and she will use her Israeli allies to put pressure on the Americans to give her a spot in Afghanistan. She will try to bifurcate Afghanistan between Pro-Pakistani Pakhtuns and other areas where Bharat may have influence. None of these machinations will work or impede the inevitable union between Pakistan and Afghanistan. When the Americans invented AfPak–it was a fortuitous omen for the one people divided artificially by the British.